Different ethnicities, race groups and religious groups all feel
independently that the group to which they belong has stronger views
about the highly sensitive topic of egg donation. The reality is that
egg donation is very personal and the exploration of such treatment is
ultimately based on the individual's own circumstances. The uniqueness
of the decisions are influenced by people's own prominent histories and
the influence of the associated culture.
Typically, Caucasian
South Africans tend to take longer to accept the fact of requiring donor
eggs to conceive. Although the trend of advanced fertility treatments
is growing, proceeding with an egg donor remains a highly private
decision. The general public remain in awe and interest of concepts such
as egg donation, which always requires further explanation, to ensure
everyone fully understands that the topic is human egg donation of the
female.
In Africa, cultures amongst the Black Africans are that of
fertility and the bearing of children is almost a given. As infertility
neither discriminates against race nor culture, a certain proportion of
woman from all groups will fall victim to infertility. Black woman have
always given a fixed decision that the donor egg conception will remain
highly private without even grandparents knowing about the egg donor.
The ability to find an egg donor of the same ethnic group enables these
hopeful parents to have the promise of a similar child to the physical
traits of the commissioning parents and restore hope from a potential
ostracised situation of being barren and the only family without
children. Black families have typically borne many children in one
household, so whilst it cannot be said that one woman's pain of
infertility is greater than another, it could be argued that the stakes
are higher if associated families have conceived several children and
one struggling lady is battling to have a mere one child.
Black
recipients tend to make decisions quicker about their egg donor. South
Africa is also a haven for egg donation treatments for neighbouring
African states, such as Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Nigeria who share some of
the African cultures of conceiving and having many children.
A
new African commissioning parent shared his story that he was raised in
an environment where his genetic mother was actually his sister. He only
become aware of this in his late teens, which left him somewhat
deceived. His grandmother (mother of his genetic mother) assumed the
role and responsibility of mother in the home. He personally had to
resolve extensive personal conflicts about the concept of an anonymous
egg donor. After understanding that an egg donor is not a mother and
really a donor, he was able to distinguish between mother and egg donor.
With this newfound realisation, he has realised that conception with an
anonymous egg donor is not repeating his own deception of not having
the truth about the genetic mother. His is a choice, whereas his family
situation manifested as a result of an unplanned situation.
Although
Australian and British recipients travelling to South Africa have to
incur more costs relative to the travel investment for such fertility
treatments abroad, there tends to be a greater initial acceptance. There
appears to be a quicker turnaround in terms of decision making and
confirming the preferred donor. This may be that there is an inherent
understanding that further planning is required to facilitate and
arrange such an international trip. A further possible consideration is
that Australians and UK recipients have possibly explored other
international egg donation options, whereas South Africans tend to
explore national rather than international scenarios.
Accordingly,
each individual is guided by their own personal history in terms of
decision making around the selection of the egg donor, the promptness
hereof and other supporting decisions, such as aspects of importance in
the egg donor as well as maintaining the confidentiality of the donor
egg role in the conception.
No comments:
Post a Comment